As requested by Ace:
[4/6/2014 10:15:51 AM] Shadow Stalker: [Sunday, April 06, 2014 9:20 AM] Shadow Stalker:
<<< https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WX5 ... qAZMA/edit
[4/6/2014 10:15:54 AM] Julie: ty
[4/6/2014 10:16:51 AM] Locuz: i dont have access..
[4/6/2014 10:16:56 AM] Shadow Stalker: one sec..
[4/6/2014 10:17:15 AM] Julie: I need access also please...
[4/6/2014 10:17:43 AM] Shadow Stalker: now try
[4/6/2014 10:18:33 AM] Julie: still says I need permission...
[4/6/2014 10:18:45 AM] Locuz: same here
[4/6/2014 10:19:01 AM] Shadow Stalker: hmm..its set to anyone with internet access can view it
[4/6/2014 10:19:26 AM] Julie: (facepalm)
[4/6/2014 10:19:38 AM] Julie: still not working...
[4/6/2014 10:20:33 AM] Shadow Stalker: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17Xg ... sp=sharing
[4/6/2014 10:20:37 AM] Shadow Stalker: try that
[4/6/2014 10:20:52 AM] Locuz: better
[4/6/2014 10:21:00 AM] Shadow Stalker: hehe
[4/6/2014 10:28:22 AM] Julie: is this the version up for a vote?
[4/6/2014 10:29:21 AM] Shadow Stalker: Its the one I am proposing, its the revised version Serafim came up with , minus the cosmetic additions to the wording that I added for clarity.
[4/6/2014 10:30:31 AM] Shadow Stalker: now would be a good time tho if everyone approves of it to have people say so officially..btw..Krull just informed me BoW is most likely going to join the Pact.
[4/6/2014 10:32:16 AM] Julie: I Accept it as currently written for STEEL...
[4/6/2014 10:33:19 AM] Shadow Stalker: I Accept it as written for WOLF
[4/6/2014 10:34:41 AM] purifier: fine by ddos, just want something approved already
[4/6/2014 10:34:44 AM] Locuz: I accept it as written for DEATH
[4/6/2014 10:35:00 AM] annayana: Ok for kaos
[4/6/2014 10:35:15 AM] Shadow Stalker: Where ya at Puri?
[4/6/2014 10:35:29 AM] Shadow Stalker: oh sorry just saw it lol
[4/6/2014 10:35:35 AM] Shadow Stalker: (chuckle)
[4/6/2014 10:35:55 AM] Shadow Stalker: good..then we are a go till the next senario hits us rofl
[4/6/2014 10:36:19 AM] purifier: yeah, sure we will have kinks as we go, meet back on the stoner holiday if we need to (chuckle)
Now just for reference: here is previous version that was created and worked on first (in order of design and mention in the Allied Guild Leader Chat, just so everyone can see its progression:
1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wqz ... g4YfM/edit
then came this one:
2. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1za1 ... BULLE/edit
and finally the revised version as listed above in the Skype chat now listed (below) that we all agreed on BEFORE additional language was added to clarify unclear points of confusion regarding Inactives and un-guilded players.
And I concede the point the additional language you mention Ace was never ratified, but was something ALL allied leaders were aware of if they read the Allied Leader Skype chat when said guilds would argue over it in the early days of the Pact - due to the actions of DEATH/WOLF and KAOS when sending fleets to hit inactive/un-guilded bases in each others SH over the course of the Pacts existence, something that was a heated discussion many times, but I must point out where neither side ever derbed the others fleet over it.
That being said however, the NAP for Allied fleets inside each others SHs is clearly listed in this last and OFFICIAL version show below that each Allied GM signed off on (including Puri as show in the above Skype logs on/at [4/6/2014 10:34:41 AM]... which is the same version Nightmare uses as a reference.https://docs.google.com/document/d/17Xg%20...%20sp=sharing
So, lets end the debate because its pointless. We are fighting, regardless of who did what, who was right, who was wrong or any other trolling and complaining listed in any thread/post regarding this dead horse issue. The server is active once more and people are having fun. If that is all that came from our efforts and the failure of the Kappa Pact, then I have no complaints (regarding the who did what argument) that are worth mention again.
GOOD LUCK TO EVERYONE! MERRY XMAS! HAPPY NEW YEAR - AND MOST OF ALL - HAVE FUN!!!