DA have reviewed their diplomatic stance!

svebor
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed 08 May, 2013 09:15

Re: DA have reviewed their diplomatic stance!

Postby svebor » Wed 06 Nov, 2013 15:22

tagaras wrote:
izanami wrote:Y
I posted DNH with SA days ago, when I was asked by DA to do so. However SA continued to hit us. So, I told Ven I was going to take it down and would reinstate it when SA had it posted on their end. And this is the result.
As a part of this in the SA side i'd like to mention that nothing would have happened if your player Svebor didn't take our occs and retake again and again....you guys should not do this things and for no player this is honorable .

I will not participate in this any longer, this was just to clarify the situation 8-)
If you really believe this than it just shows what a noob you are.
What are you talking about "for no player this is honorable"?

This is a war game, not knights of the round table.
Taking occs from guilds that you are not pacted with is perfectly natural.

Every single HH or Orz invasion in 30s I lost all my occs.

After we were backstabbed by HH I lost all my occs in 30s to DA.
So what? I didn't send them messages saying "you are not honorable players", i took the time to take what i can back.

I know for a fact that my occs are posted on DA boards with orders for their members to take them. It's perfectly normal.

This DA *beep* has nothing to do with anything sexy has done. It's purely Chaos Knight exercising his powers as GM to do whatever damn well he likes. Saying that our attacks on SA are the reason is bull since we never attacked any of SA players after DNH was posted on our boards. We did, however, get attacked by SA, our occs stolen, our JG bases derbed - all of it after the DNH was posted on our side.

And speaking about backstabbing by DA, it's funny how DA can go and derb 100mil+ fleet of GHOST's training guild GGII without any response by GHOST, but when wicked and myself derb some small SA blob (8 mil i think it was) than all of a sudden DA got it's panties in a bunch.

tagaras
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu 16 Aug, 2012 10:11
Guild: [EvH] WELCOME TO EVENT HORIZON!
Galaxy: Mira

Re: DA have reviewed their diplomatic stance!

Postby tagaras » Wed 06 Nov, 2013 15:59

''Taking occs from guilds that you are not pacted with is perfectly natural.''
''Saying that our attacks on SA are the reason is bull since we never attacked any of SA players after DNH was posted on our boards ''
Ok...you are a real magician here , how do you call the one that after a DNH is made was attacking occs?
''If you really believe this than it just shows what a noob you are.
What are you talking about "for no player this is honorable"?''
And as for me...yes i'm noob man ...i thought pacts are there to be held....

svebor
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed 08 May, 2013 09:15

Re: DA have reviewed their diplomatic stance!

Postby svebor » Wed 06 Nov, 2013 16:11

tagaras wrote:
''Taking occs from guilds that you are not pacted with is perfectly natural.''
''Saying that our attacks on SA are the reason is bull since we never attacked any of SA players after DNH was posted on our boards ''
Ok...you are a real magician here , how do you call the one that after a DNH is made was attacking occs?
''If you really believe this than it just shows what a noob you are.
What are you talking about "for no player this is honorable"?''
And as for me...yes i'm noob man ...i thought pacts are there to be held....
I need a translation of this one if I'm to answer:

"how do you call the one that after a DNH is made was attacking occs?"

Can you run it through google translate once more?

tagaras
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu 16 Aug, 2012 10:11
Guild: [EvH] WELCOME TO EVENT HORIZON!
Galaxy: Mira

Re: DA have reviewed their diplomatic stance!

Postby tagaras » Wed 06 Nov, 2013 16:21

Can you run it through google translate once more?
''Svebor Svebor Svebor '' ...that's all i get man :)

Ok...i know i'm not English or American but i think you get the point... 8-)

Baby Kitteh
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed 06 Nov, 2013 16:33

Re: DA have reviewed their diplomatic stance!

Postby Baby Kitteh » Wed 06 Nov, 2013 16:38

svebor wrote:
tagaras wrote:
izanami wrote:Y
I posted DNH with SA days ago, when I was asked by DA to do so. However SA continued to hit us. So, I told Ven I was going to take it down and would reinstate it when SA had it posted on their end. And this is the result.
As a part of this in the SA side i'd like to mention that nothing would have happened if your player Svebor didn't take our occs and retake again and again....you guys should not do this things and for no player this is honorable .

I will not participate in this any longer, this was just to clarify the situation 8-)
If you really believe this than it just shows what a noob you are.
What are you talking about "for no player this is honorable"?

This is a war game, not knights of the round table.
Taking occs from guilds that you are not pacted with is perfectly natural.

Every single HH or Orz invasion in 30s I lost all my occs.

After we were backstabbed by HH I lost all my occs in 30s to DA.
So what? I didn't send them messages saying "you are not honorable players", i took the time to take what i can back.

I know for a fact that my occs are posted on DA boards with orders for their members to take them. It's perfectly normal.

This DA *beep* has nothing to do with anything sexy has done. It's purely Chaos Knight exercising his powers as GM to do whatever damn well he likes. Saying that our attacks on SA are the reason is bull since we never attacked any of SA players after DNH was posted on our boards. We did, however, get attacked by SA, our occs stolen, our JG bases derbed - all of it after the DNH was posted on our side.

And speaking about backstabbing by DA, it's funny how DA can go and derb 100mil+ fleet of GHOST's training guild GGII without any response by GHOST, but when wicked and myself derb some small SA blob (8 mil i think it was) than all of a sudden DA got it's panties in a bunch.
So you go hide in DA stronghold and attack DA subguild and there were repercussions....WOW, Who would've thunk it...I mean, I'm just flabergasted that this would actually happen

svebor
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed 08 May, 2013 09:15

Re: DA have reviewed their diplomatic stance!

Postby svebor » Wed 06 Nov, 2013 16:51

Baby Kitteh wrote:
So you go hide in DA stronghold and attack DA subguild and there were repercussions....WOW, Who would've thunk it...I mean, I'm just flabergasted that this would actually happen
[/quote][/quote]

can anybody in SA actually read? or are you still learning?
What don't you get?

We had NAP with DA, not SA.
Being training guild of napped guild means nothing in terms of NAP.
After DA got upset about us derbing SA and asked us to DNH SA we agreed.
DNH was posted on our boards.
Nobody from SEXY attacked SA after that.
CK sees our levi rapeable fleets in 34, makes up some bullcrap to drop NAP as he was incoming to our blob.

These are the facts.

Baby Kitteh
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed 06 Nov, 2013 16:33

Re: DA have reviewed their diplomatic stance!

Postby Baby Kitteh » Wed 06 Nov, 2013 16:56

svebor wrote:
Baby Kitteh wrote:
So you go hide in DA stronghold and attack DA subguild and there were repercussions....WOW, Who would've thunk it...I mean, I'm just flabergasted that this would actually happen
[/quote]

can anybody in SA actually read? or are you still learning?
What don't you get?

We had NAP with DA, not SA.
Being training guild of napped guild means nothing in terms of NAP.
After DA got upset about us derbing SA and asked us to DNH SA we agreed.
DNH was posted on our boards.
Nobody from SEXY attacked SA after that.
CK sees our levi rapeable fleets in 34, makes up some bullcrap to drop NAP as he was incoming to our blob.

These are the facts.[/quote]

So you believe that because you have a nap with DA, It's ok for you to hunt their subguild in their stronghold....That's some funny sheet right there dude...And it appears that you personally were retaking occ's even after the DNH with SA went on yall's board

tagaras
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu 16 Aug, 2012 10:11
Guild: [EvH] WELCOME TO EVENT HORIZON!
Galaxy: Mira

Re: DA have reviewed their diplomatic stance!

Postby tagaras » Wed 06 Nov, 2013 17:11

And it appears that you personally were retaking occ's even after the DNH with SA went on yall's board
True..... 8-)

User avatar
lilsammy
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 161
Joined: Mon 01 Aug, 2011 15:04
Guild: M: ~HH~
Galaxy: Mira
Location: Scotland

Re: DA have reviewed their diplomatic stance!

Postby lilsammy » Wed 06 Nov, 2013 21:02

izanami wrote:Oh please. You're starting to sound like Balor with his spin on EVERYTHING to make his guild the ever honorable ones just "reacting" to situations.

CK cancelled pact with no notice, over Skype, while I was offline. Even if dropping pact was justified, that was a chicken**** thing to do. You guys saw an easy snack from players you've wanted to derb for a long time and a "way out" to get what you wanted. Don't sugar coat it.
Image

In B4 Locked!

Themis: "we don't know the admins and are lower than pondlife in the general pecking order of AEstuffs."
User avatar
Shark Bait
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 515
Joined: Sun 30 Dec, 2012 22:14
Guild: [Whats a guild?]
Galaxy: Nova
Location: 3rd Star to the right

Re: DA have reviewed their diplomatic stance!

Postby Shark Bait » Tue 12 Nov, 2013 23:55

Hmm...well it's been a while and this thread still aint locked :roll:

Themis wrote:I'm not impressed with the goats. :neutral2:
Livestock threads belong in tavern.
User avatar
Wlerin
Addicted Member
Addicted Member
Posts: 19659
Joined: Mon 08 Dec, 2008 23:35
Guild: L:[USSV]
P:[AKB48]
A2:[(-o-)]
Location: Gondolin

Re: DA have reviewed their diplomatic stance!

Postby Wlerin » Wed 13 Nov, 2013 00:14

His trolldar was misaligned.

User avatar
Shark Bait
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 515
Joined: Sun 30 Dec, 2012 22:14
Guild: [Whats a guild?]
Galaxy: Nova
Location: 3rd Star to the right

Re: DA have reviewed their diplomatic stance!

Postby Shark Bait » Sun 17 Nov, 2013 21:49

Wlerin you look quite hot in that new profile pic. I'd give you a chance.... :whisle:

Themis wrote:I'm not impressed with the goats. :neutral2:
Livestock threads belong in tavern.
User avatar
JakeWarLock
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 753
Joined: Wed 08 Oct, 2008 03:20
Guild: Guess....

Re: DA have reviewed their diplomatic stance!

Postby JakeWarLock » Mon 18 Nov, 2013 01:41

:whisle:

RFA forever! :twisted:

You never know where I lurk at.. I am in Alpha somewhere.. as pretty much somewhere else in other servers. :paranoid:

I am but a shadow of my former self. I am Jake WarLock, Supreme Mystic of many realms.
User avatar
SilverKnight
Addicted Member
Addicted Member
Posts: 10603
Joined: Mon 06 Aug, 2007 18:13
Galaxy: Beta
Location: Southampton NY
Contact:

Re: DA have reviewed their diplomatic stance!

Postby SilverKnight » Mon 18 Nov, 2013 07:06

Shark Bait wrote:Wlerin you look quite hot in that new profile pic. I'd give you a chance.... :whisle:
Take a Chance on me...

http://silverknight1966.blogspot.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://silverknightonae.tumblr.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In before lock doesn't count when you are the one asking for it :neutral2: -Themis
User avatar
Wlerin
Addicted Member
Addicted Member
Posts: 19659
Joined: Mon 08 Dec, 2008 23:35
Guild: L:[USSV]
P:[AKB48]
A2:[(-o-)]
Location: Gondolin

Re: DA have reviewed their diplomatic stance!

Postby Wlerin » Mon 18 Nov, 2013 07:18

Shark Bait wrote:Wlerin you look quite hot in that new profile pic. I'd give you a chance.... :whisle:
"You"

Um... I hate to break this to you, but...


Return to “Mira”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests