[FAT] & [XCOM]

Burgess
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1025
Joined: Mon 06 May, 2013 13:05

[FAT] & [XCOM]

Postby Burgess » Tue 13 Jan, 2015 01:19

I thought I would do a little update on the situation in the 20s from my point of view.

[XCOM] launched into C26 and started farming the few [FAT] players there and [WOLF] until the DNH kicked in between [XCOM] & [WOLF]. Several [WOLF] players have tagged to [FAT] after the DNH got signed with [SMURF] & [WOLF].
Currently there's a lot of confusion in the ranks of [WOLF] after the backstab their LS planned with regards to the CF with [FAT]. And many are looking closely at the next moves of [SMURF] all being a lil paranoid and all.

In reaction to [XCOM] launching into C26, [FAT] started blobbing in C25 and launched into C26. [XCOM] decided they wanted to try and contest but eventually recalled after seeing that the [FAT] launch was p. decent sync'd. Will be interesting to see the next moves of both guilds, both will be in C26 tonight.

Have fun to everyone involved ^^

User avatar
abnormal soldier
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1483
Joined: Sun 08 Apr, 2012 23:42
Guild: Dead and Gone

Re: [FAT] & [XCOM]

Postby abnormal soldier » Tue 13 Jan, 2015 01:44

Probably was a mistake for xcom to let them land in 26, cause now they can just stack their blob until they have enough to launch. But meh

"This game is cancer" -FrostyGoblin
Burgess
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1025
Joined: Mon 06 May, 2013 13:05

Re: [FAT] & [XCOM]

Postby Burgess » Tue 13 Jan, 2015 02:01

XCOM has been ordered to evac 26 and launch back to 27.

User avatar
abnormal soldier
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1483
Joined: Sun 08 Apr, 2012 23:42
Guild: Dead and Gone

Re: [FAT] & [XCOM]

Postby abnormal soldier » Tue 13 Jan, 2015 02:05

Feed FAT inactives, seems legit :roll:

"This game is cancer" -FrostyGoblin
User avatar
SouthOnFir3
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 669
Joined: Sat 12 Oct, 2013 23:31
Guild: E2-TILT

Re: [FAT] & [XCOM]

Postby SouthOnFir3 » Tue 13 Jan, 2015 02:07

Don't be jelly first blood. everyone is just getting more fed then you ; )

fkabnk wrote: Oh boy, that's some addex level stuff right there.
Burgess
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1025
Joined: Mon 06 May, 2013 13:05

Re: [FAT] & [XCOM]

Postby Burgess » Tue 13 Jan, 2015 02:12

SouthOnFir3 wrote:Don't be jelly first blood. everyone is just getting more fed then you ; )
Not that hard when you don't entirely pact your cluster before even fighting a lil :paranoid:

Simba
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 223
Joined: Sun 24 Jul, 2011 20:41
Guild: Evil pl0x
Galaxy: Kappa
Location: Scotland

Re: [FAT] & [XCOM]

Postby Simba » Tue 13 Jan, 2015 04:33

I heard u suck

User avatar
Cloud NiiNe
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 782
Joined: Sun 26 May, 2013 00:51
Guild: P: VoID
A2: RAWR
B2: ROMA
Galaxy: Pegasus

Re: [FAT] & [XCOM]

Postby Cloud NiiNe » Tue 13 Jan, 2015 06:54

I'm lost in the 20s politics. Who's the ones with the man-parts?

Active: P-VoID, A2-RAWR, B2-ROMA

Retired: O-OFACE, M-BURN/SA, N-some guild
Burgess
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1025
Joined: Mon 06 May, 2013 13:05

Re: [FAT] & [XCOM]

Postby Burgess » Tue 13 Jan, 2015 10:41

[FAT] ended up derbing 2.7 mil of [XCOM] inactives spread over 3 blobs in C26. 3 derbpiles have been made respectively 500k, 400k and 300k. [FAT] made a break even with losses and derbs. Was worth staying up all night :clap:

[XCOM] are now rallying all their fleets in C27.

Simba
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 223
Joined: Sun 24 Jul, 2011 20:41
Guild: Evil pl0x
Galaxy: Kappa
Location: Scotland

Re: [FAT] & [XCOM]

Postby Simba » Tue 13 Jan, 2015 10:50

get rekt

User avatar
FrostyGoblin
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 2830
Joined: Wed 20 Mar, 2013 19:18
Guild: sIMPire
Galaxy: Omega

Re: [FAT] & [XCOM]

Postby FrostyGoblin » Tue 13 Jan, 2015 11:52

Everyone is trash.

Retired servers: N: WTF?, O: sIMPire, P: Royal, A2: xoxo, B2: Ayy, C2: LEWD!, Q: YURI!, D2: LF, E2: 3SUM, F2: PPD, R: Frank, G2: Mayu, H2: STARK, I2: CQC, S: SMUG! | Forced Labour: J2: KS, K2: FTW
Cyber villain extraordinaire
Addex
Addicted Member
Addicted Member
Posts: 3765
Joined: Thu 03 Sep, 2009 16:39
Guild: Bathing in the farms emotears
Galaxy: Pegasus

Re: [FAT] & [XCOM]

Postby Addex » Tue 13 Jan, 2015 18:30

So I think this the question everyone is itching to ask....

Are my TRs safe? Which galaxy shouldnt I trade with :scared:

Burgess
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1025
Joined: Mon 06 May, 2013 13:05

Re: [FAT] & [XCOM]

Postby Burgess » Tue 13 Jan, 2015 19:15

Addex wrote:So I think this the question everyone is itching to ask....

Are my TRs safe? Which galaxy shouldnt I trade with :scared:
You already got a trade wif me

User avatar
SilverKnight
Addicted Member
Addicted Member
Posts: 10603
Joined: Mon 06 Aug, 2007 18:13
Galaxy: Beta
Location: Southampton NY
Contact:

Re: [FAT] & [XCOM]

Postby SilverKnight » Tue 13 Jan, 2015 19:55

trading with the lowers is mostly safe.

http://silverknight1966.blogspot.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://silverknightonae.tumblr.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In before lock doesn't count when you are the one asking for it :neutral2: -Themis
User avatar
abnormal soldier
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1483
Joined: Sun 08 Apr, 2012 23:42
Guild: Dead and Gone

Re: [FAT] & [XCOM]

Postby abnormal soldier » Tue 13 Jan, 2015 21:18

SilverKnight wrote:trading with the lowers is mostly safe.
Keyword mostly, as in kind of, as in maybe :paranoid:

"This game is cancer" -FrostyGoblin

Return to “Centauri”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests