Drako Law Alleged Violation #1: LF attack on Alien in 29

Titanium
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat 21 Jan, 2012 14:42
Reputation: 5

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #1: LF attack on Alien in 2

Postby Titanium » Wed 12 Aug, 2015 16:32

I vote you kill yourself, Hayley.

User avatar
AggressiveTurtle
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 3352
Joined: Sun 12 Dec, 2010 22:23
Reputation: 94
Guild: 1st
SoT
USSV
AYAYA
BDSM
Location: Where the hood at
Contact:

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #1: LF attack on Alien in 2

Postby AggressiveTurtle » Wed 12 Aug, 2015 16:32

IllusiveSoldier wrote:No, wrong, Nom doesn't exist anymore. If we actually would start acting by the law LF would loose, because no1 said that:
1) nom was high jacked by seldon:
- If it was Ls of LF should have made a formal written complaint on the forum, and not moved in 23. Neither should Nom have merged into LF.
- Even if their claim was valid, the Sh should have been updated by the last info, because now their claim of D29 is invalid.

Conclusion D29 is held by an invalid guild


That is some tier one autism right there
Last edited by AggressiveTurtle on Wed 12 Aug, 2015 16:33, edited 1 time in total.

[02:34:48] Chrkolby: masa is a *beep*
[02:34:58] slayerr: he's like the indian version of jay z
[02:35:24] Minesh: oh god lol
AggressiveTurtle » Thu 26 May, 2011 17:45 wrote:Return of the King?? pfft i was always here >.>
User avatar
Wlerin
Addicted Member
Addicted Member
Posts: 19372
Joined: Mon 08 Dec, 2008 23:35
Reputation: 580
Guild: L:[USSV]
P:[AKB48]
A2:[(-o-)]
Location: Gondolin

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #1: LF attack on Alien in 2

Postby Wlerin » Wed 12 Aug, 2015 16:32

IllusiveSoldier wrote:No, wrong, Nom doesn't exist anymore. If we actually would start acting by the law LF would loose, because no1 said that:
1) nom was high jacked by seldon:
- If it was Ls of LF should have made a formal written complaint on the forum, and not moved in 23. Neither should Nom have merged into LF.
- Even if their claim was valid, the Sh should have been updated by the last info, because now their claim of D29 is invalid.

Conclusion D29 is held by an invalid guild

No, wrong. LF is NOM is LF. It's not that hard to understand. Seldon was left to hold the tag, and changed it to NOM because that's what he does when given GM powers. Sean decided to update the thread for some reason, but that didn't change which guild was recognized as SH owner. Also as I said earlier, guild tags or even guild ids != guilds. If a guild is going to lose recognition every time they change tag or have to change their ID because some inactofag was left holding GM then ... well, things are going to get crazy.
Last edited by Wlerin on Wed 12 Aug, 2015 16:34, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
RedQueen
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri 19 Sep, 2014 06:25
Reputation: 5
Guild: Pax

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #1: LF attack on Alien in 2

Postby RedQueen » Wed 12 Aug, 2015 16:34

TrueJustice wrote:more likely that fka and Ed need to tighten that butt hole


I'm afraid it's too late for them to make it tighter.. they love each other too much..

Addex
Addicted Member
Addicted Member
Posts: 3692
Joined: Thu 03 Sep, 2009 16:39
Reputation: 174
Guild: Bathing in the farms emotears
Galaxy: Pegasus

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #1: LF attack on Alien in 2

Postby Addex » Wed 12 Aug, 2015 16:42

Wlerin wrote:
Addex wrote:It is very shocking that 29 shows as LF SH in the thread made by Frosty prolly nothing to do with Frosty being in 29.

You might want to actually look at the current SH thread and then at Frosty's original SH thread before accusing him or it of bias. Frosty's thread has [EE] for most of the 20s.


Thor claimed 29 on August 8th in the stronghold thread , showing he had a greater presence of bases than LF. At the time LF and Alien are not fighting and fka says he is gonna join 23 for the joke war on ORI. His request got ignored, if you (not you) gonna change the rules of how SH is defined to whatever it fits you then why have a thread for them to begin with. You know LF cant defend 29 vs Aliens sans backstab.

Twerk Team
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 720
Joined: Thu 27 Jun, 2013 04:18
Reputation: 30
Guild: BSMF
MODS
RAVE
(-o-)

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #1: LF attack on Alien in 2

Postby Twerk Team » Wed 12 Aug, 2015 19:39

It got ignored for the same reasons LF was granted the SH in the first place. ALIEN had all their farmest members in 29 and it clearly wasn't a "SH" for them.

Fett wrote:I wanna be relevant.
Mr Pond
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun 08 Dec, 2013 01:57
Reputation: 0

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #1: LF attack on Alien in 2

Postby Mr Pond » Wed 12 Aug, 2015 19:45

There have been other violations to Drako ROE, but why post. I really doubt any thing will be done to violators any way.

User avatar
Winchester
Addicted Member
Addicted Member
Posts: 17638
Joined: Tue 24 Mar, 2009 00:44
Reputation: 762
Location: The World Wide Cesspool

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #1: LF attack on Alien in 2

Postby Winchester » Wed 12 Aug, 2015 19:49

I vote economic sanctions. Unless Frosty is to blame, in which case I vote assassination.

"That's what I do. I drink and I know things."
User avatar
AggressiveTurtle
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 3352
Joined: Sun 12 Dec, 2010 22:23
Reputation: 94
Guild: 1st
SoT
USSV
AYAYA
BDSM
Location: Where the hood at
Contact:

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #1: LF attack on Alien in 2

Postby AggressiveTurtle » Wed 12 Aug, 2015 20:55

I don't see how anybody can be punished until the council can give us a clear definition of a stronghold, and the stronghold thread is taken down and reproduced by someone who can communicate with the council and works with them to decide who owns 1-39.

[02:34:48] Chrkolby: masa is a *beep*
[02:34:58] slayerr: he's like the indian version of jay z
[02:35:24] Minesh: oh god lol
AggressiveTurtle » Thu 26 May, 2011 17:45 wrote:Return of the King?? pfft i was always here >.>
Twerk Team
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 720
Joined: Thu 27 Jun, 2013 04:18
Reputation: 30
Guild: BSMF
MODS
RAVE
(-o-)

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #1: LF attack on Alien in 2

Postby Twerk Team » Wed 12 Aug, 2015 20:57

Winchester wrote:I vote economic sanctions. Unless Frosty is to blame, in which case I vote assassination.

hey now that you're here, use your lawyering powers to fix the "law"

Fett wrote:I wanna be relevant.
User avatar
Winchester
Addicted Member
Addicted Member
Posts: 17638
Joined: Tue 24 Mar, 2009 00:44
Reputation: 762
Location: The World Wide Cesspool

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #1: LF attack on Alien in 2

Postby Winchester » Wed 12 Aug, 2015 21:02

Twerk Team wrote:
Winchester wrote:I vote economic sanctions. Unless Frosty is to blame, in which case I vote assassination.

hey now that you're here, use your lawyering powers to fix the "law"


Sure, but you should be aware that my billable rate is $75 an hour.

"That's what I do. I drink and I know things."
Twerk Team
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 720
Joined: Thu 27 Jun, 2013 04:18
Reputation: 30
Guild: BSMF
MODS
RAVE
(-o-)

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #1: LF attack on Alien in 2

Postby Twerk Team » Wed 12 Aug, 2015 21:03

Winchester wrote:
Twerk Team wrote:
Winchester wrote:I vote economic sanctions. Unless Frosty is to blame, in which case I vote assassination.

hey now that you're here, use your lawyering powers to fix the "law"


Sure, but you should be aware that my billable rate is $75 an hour.

Bill it to Hayley.

Fett wrote:I wanna be relevant.
User avatar
Winchester
Addicted Member
Addicted Member
Posts: 17638
Joined: Tue 24 Mar, 2009 00:44
Reputation: 762
Location: The World Wide Cesspool

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #1: LF attack on Alien in 2

Postby Winchester » Wed 12 Aug, 2015 21:05

Erm, that's $75 in United States Currency, not tear-stained tube socks.

"That's what I do. I drink and I know things."
Twerk Team
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 720
Joined: Thu 27 Jun, 2013 04:18
Reputation: 30
Guild: BSMF
MODS
RAVE
(-o-)

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #1: LF attack on Alien in 2

Postby Twerk Team » Wed 12 Aug, 2015 21:17

Winchester wrote:Erm, that's $75 in United States Currency, not tear-stained tube socks.

I'm sure you guys can work out some sort of agreement. i heard there's a decent commodity trade in those.

Fett wrote:I wanna be relevant.
Pinochle
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 555
Joined: Sun 05 Sep, 2010 15:56
Reputation: 27
Guild: Homeless
Location: Noitacol

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #1: LF attack on Alien in 2

Postby Pinochle » Wed 12 Aug, 2015 21:33

Definition of stronghold is not what should be under question here.

Drako Law interpretation is what is in question.

Laws are interpreted ambiguously to protect the victims in matters of civil affairs (not the violators). I hope the judges are reviewing the spirit of the law, and appreciate the sheer malice that was intended to circumvent the law that everyone has agreed to adhere to.


Return to “Drako”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests