Drako Law Alleged Violation #2: VuDu ressupyling after crash

User avatar
Sandcastle Smasher
Addicted Member
Addicted Member
Posts: 5324
Joined: Fri 20 Mar, 2009 00:23
Guild: F: [Dibz]
G: [NOM]
L: [USSV]
Location: Bulgaria

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #2: VuDu ressupyling after c

Postby Sandcastle Smasher » Sun 16 Aug, 2015 20:45

takiwa wrote:
Sandcastle Smasher wrote:Simply put, what is in air 5mins before landing = first wave

everything else isnt really included.
then the law needs to state that SPECIFICALLY. Because it's just as easy for me to assume that the law, as written, means that ALL fleet attacking/incoming in a hostile SH should not exceed 115% of the defending guild's total fleet.

seems almost purposely ambiguous, tbh.
The law needs to state lots of things specifically or else its completely useless.
I know things like this should be assumed as part of the law, but well, assumptions make asses of us all.

Sammael wrote:I wish I were allowed to just straight up ban people for no reason
Typhus wrote:So braver is moe?
BaNeth wrote:You silly vacation seldon ;)
TheVoice wrote:In Communist Lyra, Seldon blame you
User avatar
Wlerin
Addicted Member
Addicted Member
Posts: 19659
Joined: Mon 08 Dec, 2008 23:35
Guild: L:[USSV]
P:[AKB48]
A2:[(-o-)]
Location: Gondolin

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #2: VuDu ressupyling after c

Postby Wlerin » Mon 17 Aug, 2015 00:40

takiwa wrote:
Sandcastle Smasher wrote:Simply put, what is in air 5mins before landing = first wave

everything else isnt really included.
then the law needs to state that SPECIFICALLY. Because it's just as easy for me to assume that the law, as written, means that ALL fleet attacking/incoming in a hostile SH should not exceed 115% of the defending guild's total fleet.
Not "just as easy". That interpretation is less likely but still possible. They could revise it... or they could up the percentage a bit and make it total fleet.

FreakyBaby
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue 11 Aug, 2015 08:53
Guild: Alien
Galaxy: Drako

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #2: VuDu ressupyling after c

Postby FreakyBaby » Mon 17 Aug, 2015 01:00

5 days after this post, 7 days after this became a problem, still no response? I'd say I'm bumping this post to put it first in the forum, but it already is. If this is how long rulings are going to take, they are worthless, half the war is over. Of the 20 'council members' 17 should get a vote:
pretty easy: yes,no, or maybe (but we will work out details later)

:
(Yes)
1) 115% is the total of all fleet allowed to enter the stronghold of the guild you are at war with. No additional fleet, ..named 'exploration ships' 'resupply ships' 'intell forces' or even 'humanitarian aid relief forces' etc... Allowed. Attacking player and forces being sent should be declared.

(No)
2) You can send in whatever you want, the 115% is just a suggested amount if you want to be, generous and attack another guild with some suggested amount of fairness, but is by no means a limit on attacking forces.

(Maybe)
3) the fleet limit only counts for a specific amount of time, the time and amount of how much and when additional forces can be sent to the stronghold of the guild you are attacking, will be determined at a later date.

User avatar
Wlerin
Addicted Member
Addicted Member
Posts: 19659
Joined: Mon 08 Dec, 2008 23:35
Guild: L:[USSV]
P:[AKB48]
A2:[(-o-)]
Location: Gondolin

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #2: VuDu ressupyling after c

Postby Wlerin » Mon 17 Aug, 2015 09:35

Currently the answer is a mix between 2 and 3, which doesn't really make any sense. It needs to be revised, but there's a lot of things that need revising.

League of Losers
Banned
Banned
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun 16 Aug, 2015 22:48

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #2: VuDu ressupyling after c

Postby League of Losers » Mon 17 Aug, 2015 12:45

No one knows when or if you ressuply.Just name all your fleets the same.

User avatar
Ravem
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon 24 Dec, 2012 22:54
Galaxy: Alpha
Location: Australia

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #2: VuDu ressupyling after c

Postby Ravem » Mon 17 Aug, 2015 15:55

No, because we don't want to be lying loosers

Wlerin for emperor!
League of Losers
Banned
Banned
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun 16 Aug, 2015 22:48

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #2: VuDu ressupyling after c

Postby League of Losers » Mon 17 Aug, 2015 16:57

Ravem wrote:No, because we don't want to be lying loosers
Remain a sore loser then.

Try again later if you wish though.

User avatar
Ravem
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon 24 Dec, 2012 22:54
Galaxy: Alpha
Location: Australia

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #2: VuDu ressupyling after c

Postby Ravem » Mon 17 Aug, 2015 17:11

Well, seeing as I'm so far undefeated in this server your comment is completely bogus. But I'd rather maintain a reputation for honesty than be a known liar. Regardless of if it costs me a win in a spreadsheet game.

Try harder next time you want to troll me.

Wlerin for emperor!
League of Losers
Banned
Banned
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun 16 Aug, 2015 22:48

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #2: VuDu ressupyling after c

Postby League of Losers » Mon 17 Aug, 2015 17:16

Ravem wrote:Well, seeing as I'm so far undefeated in this server your comment is completely bogus. But I'd rather maintain a reputation for honesty than be a known liar. Regardless of if it costs me a win in a spreadsheet game.

Try harder next time you want to troll me.
You're ugly enough to be a troll.

No need for more trolling.

User avatar
Ravem
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon 24 Dec, 2012 22:54
Galaxy: Alpha
Location: Australia

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #2: VuDu ressupyling after c

Postby Ravem » Mon 17 Aug, 2015 17:34

Still failing to troll me? What's that I see, a lemon? No, no, no, three lemons. Well, I guess that's it for us then.

Come back when your finished eating them lemons mate ;)

Wlerin for emperor!
Smart Ravem
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon 17 Aug, 2015 18:06

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #2: VuDu ressupyling after c

Postby Smart Ravem » Mon 17 Aug, 2015 18:09

Ravem wrote:Still failing to troll me? What's that I see, a lemon? No, no, no, three lemons. Well, I guess that's it for us then.

Come back when your finished eating them lemons mate ;)
After you ;)

User avatar
Ravem
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon 24 Dec, 2012 22:54
Galaxy: Alpha
Location: Australia

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #2: VuDu ressupyling after c

Postby Ravem » Mon 17 Aug, 2015 18:24

Ohh yeah! I got a parody :D

Wlerin for emperor!
Smart Ravem
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon 17 Aug, 2015 18:06

Re: Drako Law Alleged Violation #2: VuDu ressupyling after c

Postby Smart Ravem » Mon 17 Aug, 2015 18:46

Guess you will be funny now. :D


Return to “Drako”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests