i think danzo saw the 5 votes for MLGA stab and made deal with devil............uh...........i mean Frank. since five votes is definitave number for Fact.SilverKnight wrote:Lemons is what happened
Frank n Co vs Zerg II
- JigokuShoujo
- Addicted Member
- Posts: 4270
- Joined: Mon 28 Oct, 2013 21:26
- Guild: A: Ni/MIN
O:ADHD/OFATE
Andro: MJ - Galaxy: Alpha
- Location: right behind you
- Contact:
Re: Frank n Co vs Zerg II
You make me violate you, no matter who you are!
Alpha and Omega. when in doubt i blame Grover.
Alpha and Omega. when in doubt i blame Grover.
JokeySmurf wrote:you guys i have a feeling you are not going to win against this one. Jig seems, Determined.
Re: Frank n Co vs Zerg II
Would any MLGA member vote for a stab? However coming 1h(!) late of entire MLGA LS explains everything. Stab or steal derbs. Stabbing the opportunist stabbers is sometimes necessary even it seems like heel.JigokuShoujo wrote:i think danzo saw the 5 votes for MLGA stab and made deal with devil............uh...........i mean Frank. since five votes is definitave number for Fact.SilverKnight wrote:Lemons is what happened
Re: Frank n Co vs Zerg II
Would any MLGA member vote for a stab? However coming 1h(!) late of entire MLGA LS explains everything. Stab or steal derbs. Stabbing the opportunist stabbers is sometimes necessary even it seems like heel.JigokuShoujo wrote:i think danzo saw the 5 votes for MLGA stab and made deal with devil............uh...........i mean Frank. since five votes is definitave number for Fact.SilverKnight wrote:Lemons is what happened
Re: Frank n Co vs Zerg II
Yeah continue to justify, say it a bunch more times, it may become the truth in an eonThall wrote:Would any MLGA member vote for a stab? However coming 1h(!) late of entire MLGA LS explains everything. Stab or steal derbs. Stabbing the opportunist stabbers is sometimes necessary even it seems like heel.JigokuShoujo wrote:i think danzo saw the 5 votes for MLGA stab and made deal with devil............uh...........i mean Frank. since five votes is definitave number for Fact.SilverKnight wrote:Lemons is what happened
^while playing with chinaIrishEyes wrote: I'm not the guy who needs a huge fleet and player advantage to win.
Re: Frank n Co vs Zerg II
There was never a real chance that MLGA would stab themselves, despite the wishful thinking of anti-MLGA.
MLGA is 125 troops. Their rival Frank is 250 (2x). So MLGA is gonna burn fleet to kill their own allies, which subtracts from their already much smaller 125 accounts full of fleet? Then MLGA will be only 30-40% the size of Frank, down from 50%, while still enemies with the superpower? The theory was always idiotic.
MLGAstab meme presumes that MLGA can easily make a solid deal with Frank, which is a dubious statement at best as it's unlikely Frank would ever accept such nonsense. And MLGA just proved they aren't serious, by casually failing the server, so there ya go Joe.
MLGA is 125 troops. Their rival Frank is 250 (2x). So MLGA is gonna burn fleet to kill their own allies, which subtracts from their already much smaller 125 accounts full of fleet? Then MLGA will be only 30-40% the size of Frank, down from 50%, while still enemies with the superpower? The theory was always idiotic.
MLGAstab meme presumes that MLGA can easily make a solid deal with Frank, which is a dubious statement at best as it's unlikely Frank would ever accept such nonsense. And MLGA just proved they aren't serious, by casually failing the server, so there ya go Joe.
Re: Frank n Co vs Zerg II
Ah Balor, not this way, their LS planned 1h late launch guaranteed them to stay alive while the ZERG would do their dirty job, killing contesting FRANK and thinning their fleet so that MLGA could easily finish the remains of R.I.P (or not depending on what is left), and steal the derbs of other part of the ZERG. Of course they wouldn't stab themselves prior to any decisive result.Balor wrote:There was never a real chance that MLGA would stab themselves, despite the wishful thinking of anti-MLGA.
MLGA is 125 troops. Their rival Frank is 250 (2x). So MLGA is gonna burn fleet to kill their own allies, which subtracts from their already much smaller 125 accounts full of fleet? Then MLGA will be only 30-40% the size of Frank, down from 50%, while still enemies with the superpower? The theory was always idiotic.
MLGAstab meme presumes that MLGA can easily make a solid deal with Frank, which is a dubious statement at best as it's unlikely Frank would ever accept such nonsense. And MLGA just proved they aren't serious, by casually failing the server, so there ya go Joe.
Re: Frank n Co vs Zerg II
Why are there still theories when rip backstabbed mlga? lol? there are no such things as pre emptive backstabs, those are just called backstabs
^while playing with chinaIrishEyes wrote: I'm not the guy who needs a huge fleet and player advantage to win.
Re: Frank n Co vs Zerg II
Goes to show how there was broad, casual mistrust (& antipathy) against MLGA from within their own failed quadruple alliance. Captain hindsight is saying that was always a red herring, MLGA was in it to win they just didn't see the stab; the red herring was always a smokescreen/diversion ("it's a trap!") against the much more predictable RIP stab. Well played by the winners.Thall wrote:Ah Balor, not this way, their LS planned 1h late launch guaranteed them to stay alive while the ZERG would do their dirty job, killing contesting FRANK and thinning their fleet so that MLGA could easily finish the remains of R.I.P (or not depending on what is left), and steal the derbs of other part of the ZERG. Of course they wouldn't stab themselves prior to any decisive result.Balor wrote:There was never a real chance that MLGA would stab themselves, despite the wishful thinking of anti-MLGA.
MLGA is 125 troops. Their rival Frank is 250 (2x). So MLGA is gonna burn fleet to kill their own allies, which subtracts from their already much smaller 125 accounts full of fleet? Then MLGA will be only 30-40% the size of Frank, down from 50%, while still enemies with the superpower? The theory was always idiotic.
MLGAstab meme presumes that MLGA can easily make a solid deal with Frank, which is a dubious statement at best as it's unlikely Frank would ever accept such nonsense. And MLGA just proved they aren't serious, by casually failing the server, so there ya go Joe.
Re: Frank n Co vs Zerg II
of course there are, but nothing to be fond of any backstab though. However necessity comes first.naethel wrote:Why are there still theories when rip backstabbed mlga? lol? there are no such things as pre emptive backstabs, those are just called backstabs
- SilverKnight
- Addicted Member
- Posts: 10603
- Joined: Mon 06 Aug, 2007 18:13
- Galaxy: Beta
- Location: Southampton NY
- Contact:
Re: Frank n Co vs Zerg II
Necessity?Thall wrote:of course there are, but nothing to be fond of any backstab though. However necessity comes first.naethel wrote:Why are there still theories when rip backstabbed mlga? lol? there are no such things as pre emptive backstabs, those are just called backstabs
That's a lie.
http://silverknight1966.blogspot.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://silverknightonae.tumblr.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In before lock doesn't count when you are the one asking for it -Themis
http://silverknightonae.tumblr.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In before lock doesn't count when you are the one asking for it -Themis
Re: Frank n Co vs Zerg II
Another post that means nothing, quoted for b*****tThall wrote: of course there are, but nothing to be fond of any backstab though. However necessity comes first.
^while playing with chinaIrishEyes wrote: I'm not the guy who needs a huge fleet and player advantage to win.
Re: Frank n Co vs Zerg II
I find it amusing that irish got all the Skype logs from our leadership chat yet Thall keeps insisting that we were planning to backstab even tho irish knows we never even talked about that.
The whole "leadership planned to launch late" meme is pretty funny aswell, moody and kd are just *beep* players that can't launch properly. And moody kept saying the launch wasn't going to be contested on the board so o guess he didn't take it very seriously himself, you should flame him for the overall awful execution of the op, not try to make up stuff that never happened.
The whole "leadership planned to launch late" meme is pretty funny aswell, moody and kd are just *beep* players that can't launch properly. And moody kept saying the launch wasn't going to be contested on the board so o guess he didn't take it very seriously himself, you should flame him for the overall awful execution of the op, not try to make up stuff that never happened.
"Lettuce is just like simming you either love it or hate it me being a turtle i love it >.>"
- AggressiveTurtle
- AggressiveTurtle
Re: Frank n Co vs Zerg II
Just check the top 10 fleet, it tells the complete story. No need to tell something else. If i remember correctly R.I.P. landed to crash area at least 45 mins late from the planned crash time! MLGA LS must be some kind of wizard to stay alive(!) so much time. Even that sincerity(!) deserves a KD.fkabnk wrote:I find it amusing that irish got all the Skype logs from our leadership chat yet Thall keeps insisting that we were planning to backstab even tho irish knows we never even talked about that.
The whole "leadership planned to launch late" meme is pretty funny aswell, moody and kd are just *beep* players that can't launch properly. And moody kept saying the launch wasn't going to be contested on the board so o guess he didn't take it very seriously himself, you should flame him for the overall awful execution of the op, not try to make up stuff that never happened.
This is as I said before, MLGA pretty showed the inention of letting others kill each other while MLGA fails refrain their strength.
Very hypocryte, as all said, you really got what you deserved.
Too bad that I wasn't in Rigel, I would let the rest of your fleet land too and then finish you all completely. This way only the innocent and good players were punished just because they followed fail LS. I'm really sorry for them.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests