The Weekly Fenix, Issue 1

team sleep
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 298
Joined: Mon 16 Nov, 2009 05:19
Reputation: 5

Re: The Weekly Fenix, Issue 1

Postby team sleep » Sun 06 Mar, 2011 10:58

This entire thread is 4 pages about arguments on RAVE history. Instead of arguing about whose history is correct, people can submit their versions of guild history. Rekronoa can post a general description based upon that.

Wow! that was so difficult. Rafen, Fappo and Co. are crying about guild history when they all had the opportunity to submit. Now you are mad because you didn't and someone else wrote the history. Pretty stupid!

So instead of wasting space on a server printing the endless RAVE rants about their history cry-fest, they could post their version of the history.

That was really hard!!!

You guys are really ridiculous.

On a more personal note, I tuned out somewhere between tear 1 and tear 20. After the RAVE guild ideals of simming and doing nothing were mentioned, the posts that were created afterwards were arguments about the level of simming rank whores RAVE turned into. I don't see the value in the retorts by the new RAVE leadership defending their positions of "simmership." It's pretty weak.

The only difference between RAVE and TE is that you are on opposite sides of a server and TE professes that they are simmer/rank-whores and you won't deal with the label stigma. You can dress up a pig, but it is still a pig with clothes on...

btw, nice job on the history Rekronoa. The only problem i see is that you talk about guilds and their roles without first giving them their own history. For instance SNM, Dibz, [WoG], Noise are mentioned but their guild history would be relevant to the history.
alexei wrote:for examples on what not to do when forum posting, search for team sleeps posts.


And for Alexei's guide to infinite contradiction see here:

User avatar
Rekronoa
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 2162
Joined: Thu 28 Jan, 2010 18:13
Reputation: 24
Guild: See sig.
Galaxy: Fenix
Location: Comptown

Re: The Weekly Fenix, Issue 1

Postby Rekronoa » Sun 06 Mar, 2011 11:49

None of them had the time to give me their thoughts, so I won't worry about it. Once they decide it is important, I will edit it in.

As to the RAVE situation, DangMan is willing to help me with his own account of RAVE's history, and once I get the time I will put it in as well.
I am Rekronoa
F: OoR

Paladin
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 337
Joined: Thu 05 Mar, 2009 08:12
Reputation: 3
Guild: Steel Legion
Moral Decay
Galaxy: Fenix
Location: Iowa

Re: The Weekly Fenix, Issue 1

Postby Paladin » Sun 06 Mar, 2011 11:58

Nice history guide.

-Paladin

Former WoG Member,
Currently a proud Steel Legionnaire
Last edited by Paladin on Sun 06 Mar, 2011 12:55, edited 1 time in total.
-Paladin
Former WoG Member, Former JR Member, Former SL spy in TE
Current Proud Steel Legionnaire

Dr. Fappo
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 893
Joined: Sun 08 Mar, 2009 14:41
Reputation: 55

Re: The Weekly Fenix, Issue 1

Postby Dr. Fappo » Sun 06 Mar, 2011 12:51

I never received a pm or the opportunity to give my personal account on RAVe history.
http://cupcakerecipes.eu - A Heaven for Cupcake Enthusiasts

User avatar
Winchester
Addicted Member
Addicted Member
Posts: 17733
Joined: Tue 24 Mar, 2009 00:44
Reputation: 766
Location: The World Wide Cesspool

Re: The Weekly Fenix, Issue 1

Postby Winchester » Sun 06 Mar, 2011 12:58

Dr. Fappo wrote:I never received a pm or the opportunity to give my personal account on RAVe history.


viewtopic.php?f=71&t=99735
"That's what I do. I drink and I know things."

User avatar
Spamhead
Volunteer
Volunteer
Posts: 8626
Joined: Wed 13 Jun, 2007 20:19
Reputation: 125
Guild: E:3SUM
F:MODS
I:PEACE
Galaxy: Fenix

Re: The Weekly Fenix, Issue 1

Postby Spamhead » Sun 06 Mar, 2011 22:51

La Roux wrote:
We want spammy back.

Oh don't, I'm blushing.

User avatar
La Roux
Banned
Banned
Posts: 482
Joined: Thu 30 Sep, 2010 03:39
Reputation: 16
Guild: C: BSMF
F: RAVE
G: (-o-)
J: FLOW
Galaxy: Juno

Re: The Weekly Fenix, Issue 1

Postby La Roux » Sun 06 Mar, 2011 23:22

<3 Spammy.

But seriously, spammy wouldn't have even bothered writing a horribly uninformed history of a guild, because he has respect for journalism

Rekronoa apparently wants to just make a half assed attempt and pass it off as such.
Reflections are protections

User avatar
Spamhead
Volunteer
Volunteer
Posts: 8626
Joined: Wed 13 Jun, 2007 20:19
Reputation: 125
Guild: E:3SUM
F:MODS
I:PEACE
Galaxy: Fenix

Re: The Weekly Fenix, Issue 1

Postby Spamhead » Sun 06 Mar, 2011 23:45

La Roux wrote:<3 Spammy.

But seriously, spammy wouldn't have even bothered writing a horribly uninformed history of a guild, because he has respect for journalism

Rekronoa apparently wants to just make a half assed attempt and pass it off as such.

I actually gave up on both a Fenix Political History and a proper stronghold guild because I didn't have the time to do either properly.

User avatar
Sandcastle Smasher
Addicted Member
Addicted Member
Posts: 5237
Joined: Fri 20 Mar, 2009 00:23
Reputation: 179
Guild: L: [USSV]
O: [DNA]
Location: Bulgaria

Re: The Weekly Fenix, Issue 1

Postby Sandcastle Smasher » Mon 07 Mar, 2011 04:11

Spammy is a noob :paranoid:

Btw SLG was looking for you or smmits, cant remember what about >.>
Sammael wrote:I wish I were allowed to just straight up ban people for no reason
Typhus wrote:So braver is moe?
BaNeth wrote:You silly vacation seldon ;)
TheVoice wrote:In Communist Lyra, Seldon blame you

User avatar
La Roux
Banned
Banned
Posts: 482
Joined: Thu 30 Sep, 2010 03:39
Reputation: 16
Guild: C: BSMF
F: RAVE
G: (-o-)
J: FLOW
Galaxy: Juno

Re: The Weekly Fenix, Issue 1

Postby La Roux » Mon 07 Mar, 2011 04:26

Sandcastle Smasher wrote:Spammy is a noob :paranoid:

Btw SLG was looking for you or smmits, cant remember what about >.>

I know what about.

I feel exclusive.
Reflections are protections

User avatar
Spamhead
Volunteer
Volunteer
Posts: 8626
Joined: Wed 13 Jun, 2007 20:19
Reputation: 125
Guild: E:3SUM
F:MODS
I:PEACE
Galaxy: Fenix

Re: The Weekly Fenix, Issue 1

Postby Spamhead » Mon 07 Mar, 2011 20:56

Sandcastle Smasher wrote:Spammy is a noob :paranoid:

Btw SLG was looking for you or smmits, cant remember what about >.>

Huh, he didn't to... PM me?

User avatar
acemavrick
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue 07 Apr, 2009 00:55
Reputation: 9
Guild: F:[TAG]
H:[RD]
J:[1st]

Re: The Weekly Fenix, Issue 1

Postby acemavrick » Tue 08 Mar, 2011 13:21

team sleep wrote:This entire thread is 4 pages about arguments on RAVE history. Instead of arguing about whose history is correct, people can submit their versions of guild history. Rekronoa can post a general description based upon that.

Wow! that was so difficult. Rafen, Fappo and Co. are crying about guild history when they all had the opportunity to submit. Now you are mad because you didn't and someone else wrote the history. Pretty stupid!

So instead of wasting space on a server printing the endless RAVE rants about their history cry-fest, they could post their version of the history.

That was really hard!!!

You guys are really ridiculous.

On a more personal note, I tuned out somewhere between tear 1 and tear 20. After the RAVE guild ideals of simming and doing nothing were mentioned, the posts that were created afterwards were arguments about the level of simming rank whores RAVE turned into. I don't see the value in the retorts by the new RAVE leadership defending their positions of "simmership." It's pretty weak.

The only difference between RAVE and TE is that you are on opposite sides of a server and TE professes that they are simmer/rank-whores and you won't deal with the label stigma. You can dress up a pig, but it is still a pig with clothes on...

btw, nice job on the history Rekronoa. The only problem i see is that you talk about guilds and their roles without first giving them their own history. For instance SNM, Dibz, [WoG], Noise are mentioned but their guild history would be relevant to the history.



OMG Team Sleep, are u sick?

J/K

i cant believe it a reasonable post form team sleep +1

User avatar
Sandcastle Smasher
Addicted Member
Addicted Member
Posts: 5237
Joined: Fri 20 Mar, 2009 00:23
Reputation: 179
Guild: L: [USSV]
O: [DNA]
Location: Bulgaria

Re: The Weekly Fenix, Issue 1

Postby Sandcastle Smasher » Sat 12 Mar, 2011 10:25

acemavrick wrote:
team sleep wrote:This entire thread is 4 pages about arguments on RAVE history. Instead of arguing about whose history is correct, people can submit their versions of guild history. Rekronoa can post a general description based upon that.

Wow! that was so difficult. Rafen, Fappo and Co. are crying about guild history when they all had the opportunity to submit. Now you are mad because you didn't and someone else wrote the history. Pretty stupid!

So instead of wasting space on a server printing the endless RAVE rants about their history cry-fest, they could post their version of the history.

That was really hard!!!

You guys are really ridiculous.

On a more personal note, I tuned out somewhere between tear 1 and tear 20. After the RAVE guild ideals of simming and doing nothing were mentioned, the posts that were created afterwards were arguments about the level of simming rank whores RAVE turned into. I don't see the value in the retorts by the new RAVE leadership defending their positions of "simmership." It's pretty weak.

The only difference between RAVE and TE is that you are on opposite sides of a server and TE professes that they are simmer/rank-whores and you won't deal with the label stigma. You can dress up a pig, but it is still a pig with clothes on...

btw, nice job on the history Rekronoa. The only problem i see is that you talk about guilds and their roles without first giving them their own history. For instance SNM, Dibz, [WoG], Noise are mentioned but their guild history would be relevant to the history.



OMG Team Sleep, are u sick?

J/K

i cant believe it a reasonable post form team sleep +1



Dont encourage him -.-
Sammael wrote:I wish I were allowed to just straight up ban people for no reason
Typhus wrote:So braver is moe?
BaNeth wrote:You silly vacation seldon ;)
TheVoice wrote:In Communist Lyra, Seldon blame you

Jonny Five

Re: The Weekly Fenix, Issue 1

Postby Jonny Five » Sun 13 Mar, 2011 01:01

The "Weekly" Fenix failed?

User avatar
Rekronoa
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 2162
Joined: Thu 28 Jan, 2010 18:13
Reputation: 24
Guild: See sig.
Galaxy: Fenix
Location: Comptown

Re: The Weekly Fenix, Issue 1

Postby Rekronoa » Sun 13 Mar, 2011 04:09

Yeah it did. Damn nub Rekronoa.

:nonono


It will be coming. I've been really busy recently, but it will be back.
I am Rekronoa
F: OoR


Return to “Fenix”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests