Post all Typos here!

[Winchester]

Ok actually you're right about it being far too long.

How about:
This player has no bases where you have fleet, bases or regions visited recently.

That is so grammatically flawed that it literally makes me cringe.

[Desmond Cheese]

When on a players forum account it says 'Reputation point' instead of 'Reputation Points'

[Evil Wabbit]

Fast Production (pay the double to build units in half the time)

Should be written as:
Fast Production (pay double to build units in half the time)

[SpeedySurfer]

When disbanding defences:

You have downgraded a defense recently. You will only be able to downgrade another defense in 24 hour(s).

This should specify that it's only on that base that the time limit applies, so as to reduce confusion. Perhaps to this:

You have downgraded a defense recently. You will only be able to downgrade another defense on this base in 24 hour(s).

[Wlerin]

The description of the 65% rule for fighters under Help > Newbies is incorrect.

It currently reads:

If a player attacks a player less than 65% of their level;

Max number of attacking fighters that can be targeted by a unit in a combat round = 2 x unit size.

It should read:

If a player attacks a player less than 65% of their level;

Max number of attacking fighters that can target a unit in a combat round = 2 x unit size.

Compare the language in the original dev log entry.

[Pylinaer]

On the account page:

Member of the guild since: 26 fev 2014

should be "Feb" instead.

Edit: There are other errors in month abbreviations as well.
abr -> Apr
mai -> May
ago -> Aug
set -> Sept
out -> Oct
dez -> Dec

just at a glance, these look like they are in Portuguese and didn't get switched during an update/maintenance or something.

[zeppelin]

Next to capital name, "c" instead of "©".
Couldnt find anything under updates and changes, but my glasses might been blurry

[ragnarök]

Next to capital name, "c" instead of "©".
Couldnt find anything under updates and changes, but my glasses might been blurry

It's been like that for 5 months nab

[zeppelin]

Really? Must have been bussy staring at my timers going down to notice it

[Dr Rush]

http://prntscr.com/5wxzc1

The finished training notification for commanders reads :{commander name} train ended."
Should read "{commander name}'s training ended."
or better yet "{commander name}'s training finished."

[Whis]

http://prntscr.com/5wxzc1

The finished training notification for commanders reads :{commander name} train ended."
Should read "{commander name}'s training ended."
or better yet "{commander name}'s training finished."

+1

Was just about to post this same one.

[Wlerin]

As brought up here: viewtopic.php?f=9&t=118904&p=2246526#p2246526

For consistency's sake, the word "armor" in the following five strings should be changed to "armour", like it is in the rest of the game:

Code: Select all

Shield = amount of damage that is absorbed before hitting armor from each shot of enemy fire.
Increases units and defenses armor by 5%.
Armor = amount of damage a unit can receive before being killed.
A Cruiser that deals 40 damage against a Titan with 30 shielding will only deal 10 damage to the Titan. If the Titan has 4000 armor then it will take 400 Cruisers to one shot kill it.
Each level increases units and defenses armor by 5%.

[Wlerin]

In the FAQ, section 6 (Bases), the very last word should be "expediency" instead of "commodity".

Do I get the same credits disbanding the base at once, or I should downgrade the buildings before disbanding?

You will get the same amount of credits (in discount on the next base construction) in both ways, so the first is recommended for commodity.

[Wlerin]

I don't think they bother fixing the grammar of the dev log. Also those are both wrong. It should be "there will be a limit set on the number of attacking..."

[Mr PiPE]