XIIII wrote:stx, ruin, take your pick lmao
H-IV dominated the lowers? um the teens you mean
I said teens.
Yes, we defeated A|A in the early stage and won a big chunk of the teens.
XIIII wrote:stx, ruin, take your pick lmao
H-IV dominated the lowers? um the teens you mean
History lesson.Tsedeqiah wrote:Umm, yeah you did...you obviously don't know your own guild's history.XIIII wrote: You lot dont remember how we were nearly taken out all that time ago...we didnt dominate from day one.
Sup Purge.Purge wrote:History lesson.Tsedeqiah wrote:Umm, yeah you did...you obviously don't know your own guild's history.XIIII wrote: You lot dont remember how we were nearly taken out all that time ago...we didnt dominate from day one.
We were invaded twice before the first server war. As in people were invading the lowers. We caused both invasions to retreat. On the first invasion we rallied close to 95% of all stx fleet and weren't sure we'd be able to win playing defense on the LZ.
But that's not the nearly taken out he's referring to. He's referring to H24 where we lost most of our mobiles and 80% of the derbs. Everyone thought we were done and would never recover. We had to fight our way back onto the server with a series of carefully picked battles over the course of the next year.
Ninja LE's of Death is not just a phrase, it's a way of life.
So who doesn't know server/guild history again?
Inigo Montoya wrote: Loco Mike, the player you picked as an example of a simmer, has above average XP and below average tech.
We're you that fella who stoled my name? That's copyrighted baby!Glaurung wrote:LocoMike.
I believe I had that name for a while during the first war with stx Good to see you around, LM.
Inigo Montoya wrote: Loco Mike, the player you picked as an example of a simmer, has above average XP and below average tech.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest