I've read a lot of what everyone has posted and have edited a lot of the responses and put them together to give us a list that is as much "in-the-middle" as I could come up with. I'm sure that there is additional tweaks that can be made to this though. This needs to get done.....Flame away
1. 1v1 wars – If Attacking guild is more than 25% bigger than defending guild then defending guild may “recruit” player(s) from their LDP to bring them up to equal numbers. Declaration of war required, but doesn’t have to be done pre launch.
2. Permocc-ing – Existing bases in declared strongholds must be brought down to JG 4 or risk being permocc’d. (To keep the fun in the server, you always need the chance of invasion….who wants to sit in their own galaxy with no chance of danger…where’s the fun in that?)
3. Guild size- 100 Max (65 if in Top 3 fleet avg per member)
-Strongholds declared(Max 5 sectors?, may overlap)
4. Forget NAP’s, allow 1 LDP/Friend (Limited Defense Pact)
- Allows Friends in other guilds to play the game together.
- You may use LDP jump gates whenever. Owner may join for gate usage but may not participate in war unless owner has been in tag for longer than 1 week.
- Whether you choose to attack someone is your decision.
5. During times of war: (non-participants)
- JG’s – see 4.
- Bases & those Fleets of guilds warring are DNH.
- Fleets off base and not in stronghold are fair game
- No Occ-stealing of either war participants
- No crashing derb pile by any non-participant including LDP
6. During times of war: (participants)
- Occ stealing permitted between 2 opposing parties
- See JG usage - (4)
- Defender/”declared upon” may surrender after losing 25% of beginning fleet and majority of derb pile (doesn’t include derb’d inactives or fleet lost doing so)
- Attacker/”War declarer” may surrender after losing 40% of beginning fleet and majority of derb pile (doesn’t include derb’d inactives or fleet lost doing so)
7. KOR/LYCAN/ANYONE ELSE? are both given a 2 month DNH by server. After the 2 months they may be “protected” by another guild for another 2 months.(i.e. can blob next to protector, you crash them, you do so at your own risk…)
Suiciders - Account becomes a farm account no questions asked.
8. Blatant breakers of rules = server-zerg against the breaker.(Terms or Punishment for offending guild will be determined by server)
Ixion Server Agreement?
- darkie
- Junior Member
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Mon 20 Aug, 2012 12:27
- Guild: GoRR :I
PUB :G
LOVE :H - Galaxy: Ixion
Re: Ixion Server Agreement?
you dont say anything about after a war so does that mean you can go to war then have someone come after u just after you finish?
I will point out here that I do not speak for GoRR and as such all posts made by me are of my own views and not that of my guild,
Re: Ixion Server Agreement?
There would have to be a stated rebuild period. Much like the current "existing/nonexisting" server agreement that is in place.
Re: Ixion Server Agreement?
u mean galaxies right ? 5 sectors really can't be specified as being any kind of stronghold unless you are a very very tiny guild-Strongholds declared(Max 5 sectors?, may overlap)
Co-GM of MD/ Founder of CRYON, Retired Co-Founder of CRUEL
Re: Ixion Server Agreement?
7.
A two month DNH followed by a period of protection will not change or improve anything whilst we are still heavily held down.....
However, just the simple fact that we have been recognise.... and mention in any agreement is a big step forward for us.....
A two month DNH followed by a period of protection will not change or improve anything whilst we are still heavily held down.....
However, just the simple fact that we have been recognise.... and mention in any agreement is a big step forward for us.....
Re: Ixion Server Agreement?
Critor - thanks for the correction... Galaxies is what I was trying to say.
Tcham - for this to work everyone would have to agree to make it work.
I'm curious as to what all the other guild leaders want now...do you even still want a server agreement?
Tcham - for this to work everyone would have to agree to make it work.
I'm curious as to what all the other guild leaders want now...do you even still want a server agreement?
- thedarklord187
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Thu 19 May, 2011 21:51
- Guild: [-Z-]vgm
- Galaxy: Ixion
Re: Ixion Server Agreement?
Z still wants a server agreement for the most part the server leaders are enforcing it unoffically I know us at z, dl , ucy, and mdk are following the protocols so far and it seems to be working.
- Archimedes
- Retired Moderator
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Mon 10 Jan, 2011 22:35
Re: Ixion Server Agreement?
Is there any reason this could not have been posted in the sticky devoted to this very topic?
viewtopic.php?f=96&t=109357" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
viewtopic.php?f=96&t=109357" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"And what is good, Phaedrus, And what is not good -- Need we ask anyone to tell us these things?"
Co-moderator for Ixion, Juno, and Kappa. Please familiarize yourself with the forum rules, and contact me if you have any questions or concerns.
Co-moderator for Ixion, Juno, and Kappa. Please familiarize yourself with the forum rules, and contact me if you have any questions or concerns.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest